|
|
Post by Señor Naranja on Jul 23, 2013 7:18:06 GMT
Reckon they'll just be one-off booster cards like the current ones or will they be permanent changes to the card?
Also, being able to change the squad numbers and captain is a nice change. It's such a simple one too, makes you wonder why they didn't put it in there in the first place. No more keepers wearing number 2!
|
|
|
|
Post by RickyFullerBeer on Jul 23, 2013 17:09:35 GMT
Sounds promising.
Glad they have fucked the formations off.
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jul 23, 2013 22:13:16 GMT
They're permo 100%
So when you're buying say for example Crouch on the market you can buy a finisher version of him or a marksmen version or engine etc.
It also balances the pricing back out. Before a 442 or 41212 player was more expensive than a 343 one. Now the styles with pace will be more expensive than say a Messi with +3 defending.
And truestokeyboy, itll make things less sweaty.
On FUT13 is a player gets 9 chem, he gets a boost on everything(lets say for arguments sake its +3). So thats +3 on everything. With this new chem style thing, players no longer get this all around +3 boost, instead you chose their style and therefore you chose what you boost.
So maybe people will just bang all the pace/def ones on defenders and pace/shoot on strikers but they'll sacrifice passing or heading or dribbling.
I think to be honest I'd do the opposite, with Agbonlahor/Sturridge I'd improve their heading/shooting/dribbling over pace as they dont need a pace boost. If it was someone like Kenwyne with already good heading then I'd give him that extra little pace to make him deadly.
David Luiz wouldnt need a pace boost, but he'd be great with a def/head boost. And Huth is already a tank, but with a pace boost it gives him a bit more to catch strikers with.
They'll be some good combo too, certainly make it better than people just bunging +10 pace on a player
|
|
|
|
Post by Ribanjo Fuller on Jul 24, 2013 6:07:36 GMT
So you can finally have a team of players with no links but full Chem if you play enough games with then?
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jul 24, 2013 19:09:23 GMT
So you can finally have a team of players with no links but full Chem if you play enough games with then? You still need links BUT theyve up'd player chem to 10 not 9. So theoretically with all players in right position and linking with a manager you could get 120 chem(obviously the max is 100) so that means you can afford to have a fair few players not on max chem. Position = 6 chem Links = 3 chem Loyalty = 1 chem |
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jul 24, 2013 19:28:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Shiny Nosehair on Jul 27, 2013 0:34:02 GMT
Finally, UT Div 1 title, so happy, will read back on all the other shit on here when I'm sober
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jul 28, 2013 12:37:03 GMT
Oh yeah Shiny, theres 10divisions next year not 5  |
|
|
|
Post by RickyFullerBeer on Jul 29, 2013 21:12:30 GMT
MOTM Brek Shea!
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jul 29, 2013 21:53:12 GMT
Will be so expensive, USA and only 2nd Prem silver MOTM. McManaman from the FA Cup was like 200k to start with then dropped to 50k when people found out he was shit.
I'll probably buy Brek if he's around 100k or lower
|
|
|
|
Post by Shiny Nosehair on Jul 30, 2013 17:05:13 GMT
Oh yeah Shiny, theres 10divisions next year not 5 Yeehaaaa That'll be 8/9 divisions of easy fun ass kicking then ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 21:04:15 GMT
Penks, build me a 20-23k team, cheers |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 21:31:14 GMT
Never mind, made a silver SPL
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Aug 5, 2013 22:53:54 GMT
Let me guess Forster, Matthews, Lithuanian CB, Izaguirre, Wanyama, GMS? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Señor Naranja on Aug 5, 2013 23:00:49 GMT
Johnny Russell, AKA the Silver Reus.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 0:10:54 GMT
Let me guess Forster, Matthews, Lithuanian CB, Izaguirre, Wanyama, GMS? ;D And brown ;D not Matthews 3 at the back |
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Aug 6, 2013 19:48:24 GMT
3 at the back with SPL?
Oooh Gunning/Rogne/Zal?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 22:11:23 GMT
The English guy, can't remember his name now though, Hutchinson?
|
|
|
|
Post by Señor Naranja on Aug 7, 2013 7:27:49 GMT
Who've you got up top? I've got an SPL silver team and love Russell but there's nobody else in that league anywhere near as good as him. Hasselbaink has got good pace but besides that he's shite. Anthony Stokes is a decent all-rounder but doesn't excel at anything in particular.
I go with Forster / Izaguirre Gunning Zaliukas Matthews / Mackay-Steven Brown Wanyama Forrest / Stokes Russell.
Tempted just to keep hold of GMS, Brown and Russell and have them as a little Scottish triangle in a hybrid with better players around them.
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Aug 7, 2013 17:39:44 GMT
Who've you got up top? I've got an SPL silver team and love Russell but there's nobody else in that league anywhere near as good as him. Hasselbaink has got good pace but besides that he's shite. Anthony Stokes is a decent all-rounder but doesn't excel at anything in particular. I go with Forster / Izaguirre Gunning Zaliukas Matthews / Mackay-Steven Brown Wanyama Forrest / Stokes Russell. Tempted just to keep hold of GMS, Brown and Russell and have them as a little Scottish triangle in a hybrid with better players around them. Thats exactly what I've got(the triangle) except I use Stokes for the 4*skills, cant stand strikers with 2*skills,no roulettes  |
|
