|
|
Post by Ribanjo Fuller on Oct 25, 2011 14:51:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Donkey on Oct 25, 2011 15:23:35 GMT
Looking forward to this game.
However, I hope its set in an actual city like GTA 4 was. Otherwise its just pointless.
If its in London I'll jizz.
|
|
|
|
Post by Revolver Ocelot on Oct 25, 2011 16:29:30 GMT
Fucking mint!
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperRickyFuller on Oct 25, 2011 16:36:57 GMT
The city is rumoured to be Los Angeles
|
|
|
|
Post by Donkey on Oct 25, 2011 17:13:56 GMT
Wow. How inventive. London Rio Paris Hong Kong Four places that would make an awesome game. Instead they will stick it in a place its been a thousand times already.  |
|
|
|
Post by Donkey on Oct 25, 2011 17:48:06 GMT
Unlike what I want with the FIFA series, I want GTA to be as unrealistic as possible. IV was ace, but it was ace because it was realistic. In order for the game to be completely fucking awesome it has to be crazy, take San Andreas for example...
You could pilot planes, use jet packs and fuck prostitutes and as a spotty teenager watch in awe as the car shook and the controller vibrated. I'm not that bothered if its set in LA, but I'd like to see this hilariousness return and for the game to be unpredictable and enjoyable. One of those games you never get bored of, like San Andreas.
Ideas
Like I've said above, some of the funny/fun stuff from San Andreas has to return, no matter where the game is set. Like the piloting of planes and the use of jet packs. I'd like Rockstar to incorporate some of the things they've put in Read Dead Redemption, by this I mean the open lands that you run/horse ride across in order to reach different places. Obviously GTA is modern day so there would be highways used by motor vehicles, these highways could connect LA to Las Vegas or San Francisco and if you venture off the highway then just like on Read Dead, you would encounter dangers such as wild animals or even Area 51.
I really do hope Rockstar try and include some of the types of things I've put here, obviously they aren't going to be avid readers of 1863, but these guys are meant to be professional game designers. If I can think of ways to make a new game brilliant, they should too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ninjadmin on Oct 25, 2011 17:56:38 GMT
They took a step backwards from San Andreas when they made GTAIV. I thought New York was pretty boring, it was one big map of nearly identical areas... San Andreas got it right with 3 big cities that are very different, with a lot of country in between and a handful of airports spread over the map, it was genius.
They need to take GTAV back to that otherwise I'm not going to be particularly interested, I got bored before finishing GTAIV and avoided those add-on games they brought out. If GTAV is anything like that then I probably won't even bother with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gaz Turner on Oct 25, 2011 21:47:44 GMT
I reckon in the future they will be able to somehow link it with google street view so you can go absolutely fucking anywhere you want. Imagine throwing petrol bombs up hanley in a game, wow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donkey on Oct 25, 2011 21:49:24 GMT
It'd cost fucking millions. But it'd earn billions.
What an idea, anyone fancy making it with me?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ribanjo Fuller on Oct 26, 2011 1:50:47 GMT
I wonder how hard it would be to merge the original Grand Theft Auto and Google street view, they're sort of similar
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Oct 26, 2011 4:53:36 GMT
It'd cost fucking millions. But it'd earn billions. What an idea, anyone fancy making it with me? You're not the first of it. After San Andreas, I wanted Rockstar to make a GTA for every city in the world. GTA Stoke-On-Trent and you could set the house as your actual house, you could go Hanley and rocket launch McDonalds and stab every fucker in JD Sports. Drive your Lambo around Newcastle market and helicopter inside the Brit. Eventually, GTA needs to merge with Google Street View. However even if they did the cunts would only do America. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2011 9:16:36 GMT
Rockstar will have listened to the criticisms of IV. Most of the gaming community claim that 4 was a big step for GTA but it lost it's soul, as Donks has said. I don't think they'll do a real life LA because it's been done to an extent in LA Noire.
I think V is more important to the genre than IV was.
On the plus side, I love the anticipation they can build just for a fucking trailier, no other dev does this like Rockstar for GTA.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ninjadmin on Oct 26, 2011 9:42:35 GMT
I really really hope it isn't LA, unless they do it like San Andreas with a massive space of desert and country in between the city bits linked with busy roads and airports.  San Andreas, map-wise was perfect. |
|
|
|
Post by Donkey on Oct 26, 2011 12:01:51 GMT
It'd cost fucking millions. But it'd earn billions. What an idea, anyone fancy making it with me? You're not the first of it. After San Andreas, I wanted Rockstar to make a GTA for every city in the world. GTA Stoke-On-Trent and you could set the house as your actual house, you could go Hanley and rocket launch McDonalds and stab every fucker in JD Sports. Drive your Lambo around Newcastle market and helicopter inside the Brit. Eventually, GTA needs to merge with Google Street View. However even if they did the cunts would only do America. Thing is, as I said it'd cost them sooooooooooo much more than a normal GTA game would. So we'd end up having to pay like £150 for it. Nevermind, if they did it it'd be worth every penny. Even old people would use it to plan their route to the shops. Were dreaming a bit here, its not going to happen for a while and by time it does we'll all be too old to be playing video games without it being quite sad. |
|
|
|
Post by Nyron Nonceworthy on Oct 26, 2011 12:26:11 GMT
Hope it's not LA. It's always fucking LA. I've just finished LA Noire and that was set there too (obvs).
Somewhere like Paris, London, Rome or some dodgy Eastern European country would be ace.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ribanjo Fuller on Oct 26, 2011 12:26:32 GMT
The San Andreas map had too many wide open spaces but the different look of the areas was brilliant. I'd be happy if they just did up Vice City. That bit of map where you'd come over the bridge then turn left and you could bomb it down the side of the road then jump over the bikers bar into the front window of the bike store was the best thing ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donkey on Oct 26, 2011 12:33:14 GMT
Hope it's not LA. It's always fucking LA. I've just finished LA Noire and that was set there too (obvs). Somewhere like Paris, London, Rome or some dodgy Eastern European country would be ace. I think apart from London the best location they could put it would be Rio. Think about it, it has a landmark in Christ the Redeemer where there'd be loads of people and a good sniping point. It has the slums which would be unique to a GTA game and awesome online and it has the rich bits with the beach which GTA games wouldn't be the same without. It has everything, and as well as appealing to USA and British people it'd appeal to South Americans as well and therefore Rockstar would make loads more money. The San Andreas map had too many wide open spaces but the different look of the areas was brilliant. I'd be happy if they just did up Vice City. That bit of map where you'd come over the bridge then turn left and you could bomb it down the side of the road then jump over the bikers bar into the front window of the bike store was the best thing ever. I like wide open spaces, it gives you a break from the busy bits if you get what I mean. As I've said further above, if they use some of the sorts of things they've put in Red Dead Redemption it'd be ace. Especially if they could stick Area 51 in somehow. |
|
|
|
Post by Nyron Nonceworthy on Oct 26, 2011 12:43:22 GMT
Yes Donks. Rio, Buenos Aries or Bogota would be good too. I say the latter two because they are synonymous with crime, especiallly Bogota for the cocaine. You could easily make a story there.
Mexico would be ace too. Just because it's mental and gang warfare is rife.
LA would just be a borefest for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ribanjo Fuller on Oct 26, 2011 12:51:06 GMT
LA would be fine, it's all about the game. Placing it aroung the Mexican border would be a good idea, but it's going to be class wherever they put it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2011 12:59:37 GMT
The wide streches of freeway's were fucking brilliant. Remember making way through the woodland bit, I was on foot because my car blew up and hijacked this blokes scrambler. It was pissing down, and there was CJ in his wifebeater, trecking through the woods to get to this new city.
There was a charm to it because you could piss about out there too. That sort of expanse hasn't been done in any other GTA and it'd be nice to have highways between citys, christ knows they've got the tech to fill it.
|
|
